• Social Facebook
  • Social Instagram
  • Social Twitter
  • Social LinkedIn
  • SNIS FOUNDATION
  • SNIS CONNECT
  • JOB BOARD
Skip to content
SNISSNIS
  • Membership
    • Member Benefits
    • Member Profile
    • Join Today
    • Code of Ethics
    • Corporate Partners
    • Fellow of the SNIS (FSNIS)
      • FSNIS Inductees
    • Mentor Match
    • SNIS Committees
  • Meetings
    • All Events
    • SNIS Insights: Online Webinar Series
      • SNIS Insights Recorded Episodes
    • SNIS 22nd Annual Meeting and Fellows Course
    • YNIS “A Day in the Life of Neurointervention” Webinar Series
  • Resources
    • Standards
    • Neurointerventional Trainees Section
      • Fellowship Programs
      • Neurointerventional Fellowship Match Application Process
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Trials
    • NVQI-QOD Registry
    • Job Board
  • Publications
    • JNIS
      • JNIS Podcast
    • Embolus
  • About Us
    • Vision & Mission
    • Scope of Practice
    • Gallery of Presidents
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Newsroom
  • Search
    • Search Icon
  • Login
July 24, 2019

Physician Experience and Practice Area Significantly Affect Decision-Making for Endovascular Treatment

Miami Beach, FL—A new study presented today at the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery’s (SNIS) 16th Annual Meeting found significant differences in decision-making for endovascular treatment (EVT) when the physician’s experience with EVT use and practice area were taken into consideration.
The web-based, global study of 607 clinicians and interventionalists had participants respond to randomly selected acute stroke case scenarios and state how they would treat the patient. Participants also indicated how they would treat patients both within the constraints of their practice and in ideal settings. The study was conducted through an unrestricted research grant from Stryker to University of Calgary.

Factors Associated with the Decision-making on Endovascular Thrombectomy for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke found that EVT decisions differed significantly between regions and specialties under current local resources, but not under assumed ideal conditions. It also found that the NIH Stroke Scale score (34.9%), level of evidence (30.2%), ASPECTS or ischemic core volume (22.4%), patient’s age (21.6%), and clinicians’ experience in EVT use (19.3%) are the most important factors for EVT decisions.

“Physicians of different specialties and practicing in different geographic regions make decisions based on different external variables,” said Mayank Goyal, MD, lead author of the study, a professor of radiology and clinical neurosciences, and the director of imaging and endovascular treatment at the University of Calgary. “While it is promising to see acceptance of EVT as the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke, it is clear that more work needs to be done to standardize decision-making for the benefit of all patients.”
To receive a copy of this abstract, or to speak with Dr. Goyal, please contact Sangeetha Sarma at 202-248-5467 or ssarma@vancomm.com.

About the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
The Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) is a scientific and educational association dedicated to advancing the specialty of neurointerventional surgery through research, standard-setting, and education and advocacy to provide the highest quality of patient care in diagnosing and treating diseases of the brain, spine, head, and neck. Visit www.snisonline.org and follow us on Twitter (@SNISinfo) and Facebook (@SNISOnline).

…..
Contact Information:
  • Contact Us
  • SNIS Website Disclaimer
  • Refund Policy
  • Privacy Policy

12587 Fair Lakes Circle,
Suite 353
Fairfax, Virginia 22033

Phone: 703-691-2272
Fax: 703-537-0650
  • Social Facebook
  • Social Instagram
  • Social Twitter
  • Social LinkedIn
© SNIS Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. All Rights Reserved.